Yawning Bread mention
The Cock will be pleased to note that this mailing list has been featured on Yawning Bread.
yax-684 Hate speech law badly drafted
Attacking Christian creationism
On the mailing list Young Republic, the hottest thread is currently "Why (fundamentalist) Christianity is dangerous". If you're the sensitive type, you might say, aha, such an accusation that this religion is dangerous wounds the religious feelings of some Christians. Charge them all under Section 298 of the Penal Code!
The fact though is that the thread is about some Christians' attempt to lay their theory of creationism thick upon us, to discredit evolutionary biology and indirectly, the very foundations of scientific rationality. The discussions in Young Republic are first class, full of meaty arguments and citations. There are no rants.
But as the law stands, these rebuttals could be construed as criminal. On the other hand, the creationists who seek to damage the education we provide our young and Singapore's hope of building a science-based future -- they get off scot-free.
As a libertarian you might say, freedom of speech includes the freedom to spread word of creationism. Fair enough. But then shouldn't freedom of speech include the freedom to criticise the religion that promotes creationism?
How does one square that with the Penal Code as written or proposed?
yax-684 Hate speech law badly drafted
Attacking Christian creationism
On the mailing list Young Republic, the hottest thread is currently "Why (fundamentalist) Christianity is dangerous". If you're the sensitive type, you might say, aha, such an accusation that this religion is dangerous wounds the religious feelings of some Christians. Charge them all under Section 298 of the Penal Code!
The fact though is that the thread is about some Christians' attempt to lay their theory of creationism thick upon us, to discredit evolutionary biology and indirectly, the very foundations of scientific rationality. The discussions in Young Republic are first class, full of meaty arguments and citations. There are no rants.
But as the law stands, these rebuttals could be construed as criminal. On the other hand, the creationists who seek to damage the education we provide our young and Singapore's hope of building a science-based future -- they get off scot-free.
As a libertarian you might say, freedom of speech includes the freedom to spread word of creationism. Fair enough. But then shouldn't freedom of speech include the freedom to criticise the religion that promotes creationism?
How does one square that with the Penal Code as written or proposed?
posted by Agagooga at 11/26/2006 05:16:00 pm
4 Comments:
if you say that creationism is only a theory, who do you not mention the fact that evolution is, and still remains 'a theory' too?
Ask him, not us. I think the difference is it does not discredit something established or scientific rationality.
i would like to agree with critical thinker. most scientific communities are aware of the flaws in darwin's theory. it reamins as a theory and in no does it from the foundations of scientific rationality. that is formed by the basics of facts and not theories. furthermore, in the same way you try to discredit creationism through textbooks and the like, aren't you also discrediting the foundations of christianity. without a God, there would be no Christianity.
No time no space because they are infinite< From fourth dimension ie born< grow and die but never ask why> Ten million one hundred million years ago? One thousand ten thousand years after today? Anyone know for sure?
Post a Comment
<< Home